Level of academic/employment prospects: Very average. There are many students recruited, but the projects are not enough. He always tried to be The first author. Students will not have articles in the past few years. The laboratory leaves work very early every day, and he prefers to hire many Female students. He hasn't posted a great article. For a newcomer who has just arrived for two years, don't think about your employment prospects as his students. Thank goodness if you can graduate. He is too weak to compare with other analysis groups.
Ethical standards: He protects the students in his laboratory from cheating. It feels like he is a bit racist, and he never pays attention to Asian students. He looks inaudible. Because he doesn't like Asian students, he said they are cheating and deducting Half of the exam score directly. However, The students in his laboratory cheat every time, regardless of the size of the exam. He Never cares.
Academic level: I have attended his class, and to be honest, the level of lectures is average at best. He mentions many things superficially. You need to study again carefully after class by yourself, which is a waste of time. For the homework, there are more than a dozen questions, and only two questions are changed. The scoring is very strict and unfair. There are many exams. There are small exams on literature every week, and time-wasting classes are arranged every week to read literature and materials. His academic attitude is not rigorous, the answers to the same questions are different, and he doesn't change it. The PPT in the classroom is always delayed until two days before the exam. The homework is Never fed back in time, and only the two questions are changed indiscriminately, which is quite ridiculous. It will not help a little after learning, so I don't recommend it.
道德标准：包庇自己实验室的学生作弊。我身边有中国同学，因为他不喜欢，被诬陷作弊，考试直接扣掉一半分数，而他自己实验室的外国人，无论大小考每次都作弊，他从来不管。感觉他有点种族歧视，偶尔跟他打招呼，他从来不会搭理你，一副听不见的样子。
学术水平：上过他的课，说实话讲课水平一般，很多东西他只是提一句，讲的很浅，需要你自己下课再认真学，很浪费时间。作业的话，布置十几道题，只改两道题，打分很严格，很不公平。考试很多，每周都有关于文献的小考试，每周都会布置看文献和资料，很浪费时间的课。学术也不严谨，同样的题目答案不一样，他也不改，就那么发布。课堂的PPT也总是拖到考试前两天才上传，作业也不及时反馈，拖着不改分，然后临时抱佛脚胡乱改两道题，挺可笑的。学完了也对自己没什么帮助，不建议选。
Level of academic/employment prospects: Very average. There are many students recruited, but the projects are not enough. He always tried to be The first author. Students will not have articles in the past few years. The laboratory leaves work very early every day, and he prefers to hire many Female students. He hasn't posted a great article. For a newcomer who has just arrived for two years, don't think about your employment prospects as his students. Thank goodness if you can graduate. He is too weak to compare with other analysis groups.
Ethical standards: He protects the students in his laboratory from cheating. It feels like he is a bit racist, and he never pays attention to Asian students. He looks inaudible. Because he doesn't like Asian students, he said they are cheating and deducting Half of the exam score directly. However, The students in his laboratory cheat every time, regardless of the size of the exam. He Never cares.
Academic level: I have attended his class, and to be honest, the level of lectures is average at best. He mentions many things superficially. You need to study again carefully after class by yourself, which is a waste of time. For the homework, there are more than a dozen questions, and only two questions are changed. The scoring is very strict and unfair. There are many exams. There are small exams on literature every week, and time-wasting classes are arranged every week to read literature and materials. His academic attitude is not rigorous, the answers to the same questions are different, and he doesn't change it. The PPT in the classroom is always delayed until two days before the exam. The homework is Never fed back in time, and only the two questions are changed indiscriminately, which is quite ridiculous. It will not help a little after learning, so I don't recommend it.