Johns Hopkins University · Medical Physiscs/Biomedical Engineering
匿名 · 审核后公开
4.0分均分 · 1 条公开评价
公开评价概览
评价数
1
均分
4.0 分
点赞/踩
0 / 0
匿名表态 · 每个导师仅一次
学生评价
4.0分
## Advisor Style & Mentorship
1. You would typically meet with the PI at least once a week, and sometimes more or less frequently depending on his preferences.
2. He is generally very accessible. 3. At times this can feel overly hands-on or intrusive, which may contribute to a less motivating work environment.
## Expectations for PhD Students 1. Students are expected to publish at least three journal papers during the PhD, with at least one in Medical Physics.
2. Students are encouraged not to work on weekends, the workload and expected turnaround times can make that difficult in practice without weekend work.
3. The PI himself works on weekends and may implicitly expect students to do the same. Delays in progress may also be perceived as a lack of capability.
## Funding & Support 1. Funding is fully provided through the PI.
2. PI states that he is supportive of activities outside the lab, he strongly discourages taking additional coursework and tends to view it as a sign of delayed research progress rather than as part of a student’s broader academic interest or growth.
3. Support for personal challenges may at times feel conditional or limited. In some cases, raising these concerns may be perceived less as a legitimate difficulty and more as a sign of weakness or lack of fit for the demands of a PhD.
## Research 1. The PI strongly prefers his own technical approach and is not very receptive to alternatives unless framed in his preferred way.
2. Research goals and priorities can shift frequently based on his needs rather than the student’s long-term development.
3. There is a strong emphasis on visible progress, making it difficult to openly discuss confusion, lack of progress, or negative results.
4. Students are expected to explain the underlying “why” behind their work, and not being able to do so may be treated as a weakness rather than part of learning.
5. This creates pressure to align with the advisor’s viewpoint and present only strong, interpretable results.
## Lab Culture Students are generally helpful and supportive of one another.
1. You would typically meet with the PI at least once a week, and sometimes more or less frequently depending on his preferences.
2. He is generally very accessible.
3. At times this can feel overly hands-on or intrusive, which may contribute to a less motivating work environment.
## Expectations for PhD Students
1. Students are expected to publish at least three journal papers during the PhD, with at least one in Medical Physics.
2. Students are encouraged not to work on weekends, the workload and expected turnaround times can make that difficult in practice without weekend work.
3. The PI himself works on weekends and may implicitly expect students to do the same. Delays in progress may also be perceived as a lack of capability.
## Funding & Support
1. Funding is fully provided through the PI.
2. PI states that he is supportive of activities outside the lab, he strongly discourages taking additional coursework and tends to view it as a sign of delayed research progress rather than as part of a student’s broader academic interest or growth.
3. Support for personal challenges may at times feel conditional or limited. In some cases, raising these concerns may be perceived less as a legitimate difficulty and more as a sign of weakness or lack of fit for the demands of a PhD.
## Research
1. The PI strongly prefers his own technical approach and is not very receptive to alternatives unless framed in his preferred way.
2. Research goals and priorities can shift frequently based on his needs rather than the student’s long-term development.
3. There is a strong emphasis on visible progress, making it difficult to openly discuss confusion, lack of progress, or negative results.
4. Students are expected to explain the underlying “why” behind their work, and not being able to do so may be treated as a weakness rather than part of learning.
5. This creates pressure to align with the advisor’s viewpoint and present only strong, interpretable results.
## Lab Culture
Students are generally helpful and supportive of one another.
No, I don't recommend this PI.